歡迎網友自由發表文章,但嚴禁發表有關相互人身攻擊言論、廣告文章、任何交易買賣 、或與本站主題不相關的文章。
請勿連續發表相同文章,關於討論區內的所有文章,本站皆擁有刪除及修改文章的權利。

回應討論主題
回應主題:
您的稱呼:
您的性別:
您的職業:
來自何方:
電子信箱:
您的首頁:
留言筆色:
討論內容: Go travelling dilantin 500 mg Ingrid Johnsrude from Queen's University in Canada, along with colleagues, recorded married couples between the ages of 44 and 79, who read scripted lines out loud. Then, each pair separately put on headphones and listened to his or her spouse's voice as it played at the same time as a stranger's voice. brand name for allopurinol The implications of this theory changed markets, even for the average investor. The concept of efficient markets helped create demand for index funds. Index funds are a type of mutual fund, which is a collection of many different stocks. Active funds profess to know which stocks will outperform the market. Index funds don't make that promise; stocks are weighted by their size relative to the rest of the market or use a weighting based on identifiable price or size characteristics. Because there's no magic formula or talent presumed in constructing these funds, they are cheap; if no one can beat the market, why pay 1 or 2 percent of your assets to someone who claims they can? If you believe in efficient markets you'd only hold index funds. This has been revolutionary for the average investor. Through the 1960s few Americans owned stock at all, and if they did they only held a handful of individual stocks, which was very risky. Now about 50 percent of the population owns stock, mostly through mutual funds and increasingly with allocations based on indexing. The average household can invest as well as many hedge funds, for a fraction of the price. The existence of index funds shows that the best innovations (in finance or any industry) are often the simplest.

留言內容: