歡迎網友自由發表文章,但嚴禁發表有關相互人身攻擊言論、廣告文章、任何交易買賣 、或與本站主題不相關的文章。
請勿連續發表相同文章,關於討論區內的所有文章,本站皆擁有刪除及修改文章的權利。

回應討論主題
回應主題:
您的稱呼:
您的性別:
您的職業:
來自何方:
電子信箱:
您的首頁:
留言筆色:
討論內容: We're at university together thesis online writers Science is about forming theories and then testing and revising those theories, and economists such as Esther Duflo and Al Roth, who have dedicated their careers to using economic experiments to learn about the world, are probably particularly upset by the authors’ characterization of economics. (I would venture to guess that most empirical economists, especially micro people, get pretty ragey upon hearing this classification.) Granted, sometimes it’s difficult to collect data (I’m still trying to figure out how to randomize the country into “tax cut” and “non tax cut” conditions, for example), but that doesn’t mean that people aren’t trying. In any case, this science versus not science thing is a bit of an irrelevant semantic dispute, and the prudent consumer of economics is better served by simply asking for supporting data rather than arguing labels.

留言內容: